Back

How often should runners strength train?

Updated August 26, 2026 · By the Runked team

Two to three sessions a week is the range that recurs across the peer-reviewed evidence on runners specifically. ACSM's baseline guideline for healthy adults sets a floor of 2 or more days a week of muscle-strengthening activity. Balsalobre-Fernández and colleagues' 2016 meta-analysis found 2 to 3 weekly sessions over 8 to 12 weeks produced a large improvement in running economy among highly trained runners, and Blagrove, Howatson and Hayes's 2018 systematic review reported the same 2-to-3-session range as likely to benefit racing performance across 24 studies. Lauersen, Bertelsen and Andersen's 2014 meta-analysis, covering a general athletic population, found strength training carried a relative injury risk of 0.315 against a non-significant 0.963 for stretching.

Coaching articles on strength training for runners tend to give a single number without saying where it comes from. The table below lines up what the named peer-reviewed sources and one general guideline actually measured, by goal, so the 2-to-3-session figure can be checked against what each study's population and outcome actually was.

Strength training frequency by goal, and what each source supports

GoalSessions per weekWhat the cited source supports
General health minimum (all healthy adults)2 or more days a weekACSM's physical activity guideline for muscle-strengthening activity generally, without a running-specific population
Running economy in highly trained runners2–3 sessions, 8–12 weeksBalsalobre-Fernández, Santos-Concejero & Grivas 2016, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, meta-analysis, 5 controlled trials, 93 runners with VO2max above 60 mL/kg/min: "a large, beneficial effect" on running economy
Racing performance, 800m to ultramarathon (moderately to highly trained)2–3 sessions, varied methodsBlagrove, Howatson & Hayes 2018, Sports Medicine, systematic review, 24 studies, 469 runners: "likely to provide benefits"; the authors note this finding varied across the studies reviewed
Sports injury reduction (general athletic population)Not tested by frequency; strength training as a categoryLauersen, Bertelsen & Andersen 2014, British Journal of Sports Medicine, meta-analysis, 25 RCTs, 26,610 participants: relative risk 0.315 (95% CI 0.207–0.480) versus a non-significant 0.963 for stretching
Well-trained female endurance athletes, mixed result2 sessions, 11 weeksVikmoen et al. 2016, PLoS One, randomized trial, 11 of 19 athletes in the strength-training arm: leg strength up 40% (p<0.01) in that arm, with no significant change in running economy, VO2max, or 40-minute distance across the full 19-athlete trial

This is Runked's own compilation, built from each source's stated population, dose and outcome. No single table published anywhere combines these sources this way. The Vikmoen row, from PLoS One, is included deliberately: it is a well-controlled trial that found the same 2-session dose raised strength without moving running economy or time-trial performance in its own all-female sample, which is why the table above treats 2 to 3 sessions a week as a range that recurs across studies, with no single trial guaranteeing the effect.

Why 2 to 3 sessions a week, according to these sources

Balsalobre-Fernández, Santos-Concejero and Grivas, publishing in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, searched four databases in September 2015 and found 5 controlled trials meeting their inclusion criteria: competitive middle- and long-distance runners with a VO2max above 60 mL/kg/min. Across those 93 runners, programs combining low-to-high intensity resistance exercises and plyometrics, run 2 to 3 times a week for 8 to 12 weeks, produced what the authors call "a large, beneficial effect" on running economy, the amount of oxygen used at a given pace.

Blagrove, Howatson and Hayes, in Sports Medicine, reviewed a wider population, 24 studies and 469 runners ranging from moderately trained to national and international caliber, across events from 800 meters to ultramarathon. Their conclusion is that "the addition of two to three [strength training] sessions per week, which include a variety of [strength training] modalities are likely to provide benefits to the performance of middle- and long-distance runners." Running economy improved by 2 to 8% and time-trial performance by 3 to 5% at middle distances in the studies that found an effect, but the authors are explicit that this was not a consistent finding across all of the work they reviewed, and their review did not address injury outcomes at all.

Lauersen, Bertelsen and Andersen's meta-analysis, in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, measured a different outcome: injury prevention, studied across a general athletic population. Stratified by intervention type, strength training carried a relative risk of 0.315 (95% CI 0.207–0.480) for sports injuries overall, the lowest relative risk of the four intervention categories the review stratified, against a non-significant 0.963 for stretching. In a separate stratification by injury type, pooling all the physical activity programs in the review together, overuse injuries carried a relative risk of 0.527 (95% CI 0.373–0.746) and acute injuries 0.647 (95% CI 0.502–0.836). That overuse figure comes from the review's pooled physical-activity programs. It does not isolate the strength-training arm on its own, so it should not be read as "strength training alone halves overuse injuries."

How to apply it to your own week

Start from the ACSM floor of 2 sessions a week if strength training is new to you, and treat 3 as the ceiling both running-specific reviews above tested, without building past it while also increasing running volume. Balsalobre-Fernández and colleagues required a program duration greater than 4 weeks, and the five trials that qualified all ran 8 to 12 weeks. That 8-to-12-week span is what the meta-analysis actually observed, so it offers no evidence either way about a shorter block.

Keagen Hadley, writing for Strength Running, suggests scheduling sessions on the same days as easy runs, or at least two days before a high-effort run, so heavy legs never show up on a workout or race day. That scheduling advice is Hadley's own practical rule. It is not a finding from either meta-analysis above, so treat it as useful for fitting sessions into a week, separate from the dose-and-outcome evidence in the table.

Common mistakes runners make with strength training

This page offers general guidance only. Talk to a doctor or physical therapist before adding strength training if you have an existing injury, joint pain, or a condition affected by load-bearing exercise.

What to do next

Strength sessions sit alongside a running week, and where they land depends on the rest of your schedule. Runked's rest days for runners guide covers where full rest and cross-training days sit around hard running efforts, and signs of overtraining covers what it looks like when total load, running and lifting combined, has outrun recovery. For the running side of the week that strength training is meant to support, running workouts covers the individual session types.

How much strength training helps your own running is worth judging against your own results, not someone else's log; in Runked the rank starts everyone at Bronze and only moves on your own runs. See how the rank works.

Find out where you stand

Runked is free on the App Store. Connect your watch or track 3 runs, and meet your Runk.

Download on App Store

Frequently asked questions

How many days a week should runners strength train?

ACSM's general guideline for healthy adults sets a floor of 2 or more days a week of muscle-strengthening activity. The two reviews that looked specifically at runners land in the same range: Balsalobre-Fernández, Santos-Concejero and Grivas's 2016 meta-analysis found 2 to 3 sessions a week over 8 to 12 weeks improved running economy in highly trained runners, and Blagrove, Howatson and Hayes's 2018 systematic review concluded that 2 to 3 sessions a week including a variety of strength methods are likely to benefit performance across moderately to highly trained runners. Neither review recommends going higher than 3 sessions a week for a runner already training on the road.

Does strength training actually improve running performance?

The evidence points that way on average but is not uniform across every study. Blagrove, Howatson and Hayes's 2018 review of 24 studies and 469 runners reported running economy improvements of 2 to 8% and time-trial gains of 3 to 5% at middle distances in the studies that found an effect, while noting this was not a consistent finding across all of the work reviewed. A more mixed result comes from Vikmoen and colleagues' 2016 randomized trial of 19 well-trained female endurance athletes: 2 heavy strength sessions a week for 11 weeks raised leg strength by 40% and muscle fiber size significantly in the 11-athlete strength-training arm, with no significant change in running economy, VO2max, or 40-minute running distance across the full 19-athlete trial.

Can strength training lower a runner's injury risk?

Lauersen, Bertelsen and Andersen's 2014 meta-analysis of 25 randomized trials and 26,610 participants found strength training associated with a relative risk of 0.315 (95% CI 0.207-0.480) for sports injuries overall, meaning injury rates less than a third of controls, compared with a non-significant 0.963 for stretching. That review covered general sports injury prevention across a mixed athletic population. It did not test which weekly frequency produced the strongest effect, so the injury figure applies to strength training as a category, without pinning down a specific weekly dose.

Does Runked track my strength training sessions?

No. Runked's free tracking, rank and weekly effort-scored leagues are built from GPS running data, and PRO's plans, race-time predictions and Runner DNA scores are also calculated from your running history. Lifting sessions are not part of that calculation. If you strength train alongside your running, that work stays outside what the app measures: the plans and predictions are built on running data alone.